The Features Of The Trust IN China(1)

更新时间:2011-02-11 09:48 找法网官方整理
导读:
I.IntroductionIncommonlawjurisdictions,thetrustisoneofthemostpopularlegalinstitutionsforwealthmanagement.Andrecentlysomecivillawjurisdictions,suchasJapan,SouthKoreaandChinahaveacceptedtheconceptoftrustandmadet

I. Introduction

In common law jurisdictions, the trust is one of the most popular legal institutions for wealth management. And recently some civil law jurisdictions, such as Japan, South Korea and China have accepted the concept of trust and made their own trust statutes. China's Trust Law, adopted by the country's top legislature in April, took effect on October 1, 2001. The Law, regulating the fiduciary relations between the settlor, the trustee and the beneficiary, provides legal framework to develop trust business in China. Through thorough comparison between the China's Trust Law and those in common law jurisdictions, we can find the features of the trust in China, and get some conclusion on the merits and the demerits of the Trust Law of China .

II. The trust in common law jurisdictions

The trust was derived from common law jurisdictions, called “the greatest and most distinctive achievement performed by Englishmen in the field of jurisprudence”. Now the usefulness of the trust as a legal mechanism has also been recognized in civil law jurisdictions. The notions are not uniform, but there are four main features for the trust in common law jurisdictions: the vesting of legal ownership of the trust property with the trustee; the segregation of trust assets from other assets of the trustee; the imposition of fiduciary and other duties on the trustee; the detachment of the settlor from the trust relations.(Edited by /www.trustlaws.net/)

A. Vesting of legal ownership with the trustee

It is a well established common law principle that, to establish a trust, the settlor must transfer legal title of the trust assets to the trustee.[1]Thus dual ownership is created: the trustee obtains prima facie (legal) ownership and management powers, whereas the beneficiary obtain substantial (equitable) ownership and thus beneficial enjoyment.

B. Segregation of the trust assets

Since separation of legal and beneficial ownership and the trustee just owns the title in name, the common law jurisdictions admit that the trust assets are independent of the inherent assets of the trustee and thus free from the claims of the trustee’s spouse, successors, or creditors (especially on his insolvency), which guarantee the safety of the trust assets. And to protect the wholeness of the trust assets, tracing process and the constructive trusts are used in the common law jurisdictions.

C. Duties on the trustee

The position of the trustee is crucial for the whole fiduciary relations, so when granted the legal title, strict duties are imposed on the trustee, which prevent the trustee from abusing the management powers on the trust property and creates a powerful check and balance between the trustee and the settlor and the beneficiary. In common law, the duties include: the duty to abide by the terms of the trust, the duty to account, the duty of good faith and honesty, the duty of care or reasonable prudence, and fiduciary duties of loyalty.[2]The latter two duties are not absolute on the trustee, which can be exempted by the trust contract or the consent of the beneficiary. But the duty of good faith and honesty and the duty to account should be abided by without exception. (Edited by /www.trustlaws.net/)

D. Detachment of the settlor

In common law jurisdictions, once the trust is established, the settlor is detached from the trust relations, thus doesn’t enjoy any right on the trust assets as well as the trustee unless some rights are reserved by the trust papers, such as termination or modification of the trust provisions and direction on the management of the trust. (Thank ellenshen for this study!<trustlaws.net>)

NOTE:

[1] See J. Mowbray Q.C. et al., Lewin on Trusts, 17th ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000) [Lewin on Trusts] at 38–55. American Law Institute, Restatement (Second) of Trusts (St. Paul: American Law Institute Publishers, 1959), §17 [Restatement (Second) of Trusts].

[2] See Lewin on Trusts, supra note 9, c. 20 & 34; Restatement (Second) of Trusts, §§ 170, 172, 173, 174,supra note 9 and Uniform Trust Code, §§ 802 and 804 (2000) (United States).


温馨提示:法律问题具有较强的专业性,如有疑问,建议一对一咨询专业律师
我在信托法领域有丰富的实战经验 ,如果你需要针对性解答,可以向我在线咨询。
响应时间 平均2分钟内
已帮助 173869
在线咨询
声明:该作品系作者结合法律法规、政府官网及互联网相关知识整合,如若内容错误请通过【投诉】功能联系删除。
相关知识推荐
我的问题 ( 1 )
可以索赔。
(1)该公司是否有讨药房租的权利? (2)我家的房子的归属问题.(3)是否能得到补偿.
房子的产权属于原房主,既然房子没有拆迁,你家租住就应该交纳房租。至于动迁的补偿与房租是2回事情。
找法网咨询助手
官方
当前在线
立即咨询
找法网咨询助手提醒您:
法律所涉问题复杂,每个细节都有可能决定案件走向,若问题紧急,建议 立即咨询 律师,并详细描述自身问题,以获得 针对性解答。24小时在线,平均5分钟回复。
(1)医生到底有无过错(2)我是否可以侵权过错起诉医院,(3)原告是我儿子还是我本人(4)您是否愿意
医生有错,可提起诉讼。原告为儿子。可以代理。有时代理费可由医院承担。
1分钟提问 海量律师提供在线解答
  • 1
    提交咨询
    详细描述您所遇到的问题或纠纷并发送
  • 2
    接入律师
    耐心等待律师解答,平均5分钟及时响应
  • 3
    获取解答
    还有疑问?60分钟无限次追问
立即咨询